Compare, analyze, and conquer. CPUcheckpro: Your CPU performance solution.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135H: Which CPU Will Dominate the Market?

Overview

  • Two of the latest contenders vying for your attention are the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H.
  • Both the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Intel Core Ultra 5 135H deliver impressive performance across a wide range of tasks.
  • In benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS consistently outperforms the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H in multi-core workloads, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and gaming.

The battle for CPU supremacy continues to rage on, with AMD and Intel constantly pushing the boundaries of performance. Two of the latest contenders vying for your attention are the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H. Both processors boast impressive specs and promise to deliver exceptional performance, but which one truly comes out on top? In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key features, benchmarks, and real-world performance of these two powerhouses to help you make an informed decision.

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: A Phoenix Rising

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is a high-performance mobile processor built on AMD’s revolutionary Zen 4 architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, clocked at a base frequency of 3.3 GHz and a boost frequency of 4.8 GHz. The 8845HS also benefits from AMD’s innovative RDNA 3 integrated graphics, offering a significant leap in performance over its predecessors.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H: A New Breed of Power

Intel’s Core Ultra 5 135H is the latest addition to their 13th Gen Raptor Lake series, featuring a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores. It boasts 14 cores (6 performance + 8 efficiency) and 20 threads, with a base frequency of 2.5 GHz and a boost frequency of up to 4.7 GHz. The 135H also benefits from Intel’s Iris Xe graphics, providing a substantial improvement in integrated graphics capabilities.

Performance Showdown: Benchmarks and Real-World Usage

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Intel Core Ultra 5 135H deliver impressive performance across a wide range of tasks. In benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS consistently outperforms the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H in multi-core workloads, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and gaming. This is primarily due to its higher core count and clock speeds. However, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H shines in single-core applications, thanks to its efficient cores.
In real-world usage, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS excels in demanding tasks like video editing, 3D modeling, and gaming, providing smooth and responsive performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, while slightly lagging behind in these areas, still delivers a solid experience for everyday tasks like web browsing, productivity, and light gaming.

Power Consumption and Efficiency: A Close Race

Both processors are designed for power efficiency, but AMD takes the lead. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS boasts a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 35W compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H’s 45W. This translates to longer battery life and less heat generation, crucial for thin and light laptops.

Integrated Graphics: A Clear Winner

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS has a clear advantage in integrated graphics performance. Its RDNA 3 architecture delivers significantly better performance than Intel’s Iris Xe graphics, making it a better choice for casual gamers and users who require a more powerful integrated graphics solution.

Choosing the Right Processor: Your Needs Matter

Ultimately, the best processor for you depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you prioritize multi-core performance and demand the best possible experience for demanding tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is the clear winner. However, if you value single-core performance and prioritize battery life, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H might be a better option.

A Final Verdict: The Power of Choice

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Intel Core Ultra 5 135H are exceptional processors that offer excellent performance and efficiency. The choice boils down to your specific needs and usage patterns. If you need the ultimate power and performance for demanding tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is the way to go. However, if you prioritize battery life and single-core performance, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a worthy contender.

The Future of CPU Performance: A Race Without Finish Line

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Intel Core Ultra 5 135H represent the cutting edge of CPU technology. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect even more powerful and efficient processors in the future. The race for CPU supremacy is far from over, and both AMD and Intel are poised to push the boundaries of performance even further.

Answers to Your Most Common Questions

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is generally better for gaming due to its higher core count, faster clock speeds, and superior integrated graphics performance.
Q: Which processor is more power-efficient?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is more power-efficient, with a lower TDP and longer battery life.
Q: Which processor is better for productivity tasks?
A: Both processors are capable of handling productivity tasks, but the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS excels in multi-core workloads, such as video editing and 3D rendering.
Q: Which processor is better for everyday use?
A: Both processors are suitable for everyday use, but the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H might offer slightly longer battery life and a more budget-friendly price point.
Q: Which processor is the best overall?
A: The best processor depends on your specific needs and priorities. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is a better choice for demanding tasks and gamers, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a good option for everyday use and power-conscious users.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Jamie is a passionate tech enthusiast and the author behind CPUCheckPro.com. With a deep understanding of computer hardware, he strives to provide comprehensive CPU comparison guides, insightful knowledge, and valuable tips to help users make informed decisions about their CPU choices.