Quick notes
- The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS packs a punch with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7 11375H offers **4 cores and 8 threads**.
- The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS consistently outperforms the Intel Core i7 11375H in Geekbench benchmarks, scoring significantly higher in both single-core and multi-core tests.
- While both processors perform adequately in 3DMark benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 8840HS again edges out the Intel Core i7 11375H, showcasing its superior performance for gaming and other graphics-intensive applications.
Choosing the right CPU for your laptop can be a daunting task, especially with the vast array of options available. Two popular contenders vying for your attention are the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS and the **Intel Core i7 11375H**. Both these processors boast impressive performance capabilities, but which one emerges as the champion in this head-to-head showdown? Let’s delve into their key features and benchmark results to determine the ultimate victor.
Architectural Differences: Zen 4 vs Tiger Lake
The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS is powered by the latest Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Core i7 11375H utilizes the older **Tiger Lake architecture**. This fundamental difference plays a crucial role in their performance characteristics.
Zen 4 brings significant improvements in terms of core efficiency, clock speeds, and overall performance. It features a new 5nm process node, enabling smaller transistors and higher clock speeds. Additionally, Zen 4 boasts enhanced instruction set extensions and a revamped memory controller, leading to faster data access.
Tiger Lake was a notable leap forward for Intel, but it falls behind Zen 4 in terms of performance per watt and overall efficiency. While it offers decent performance for general tasks, it struggles to match the power and efficiency of the newer Zen 4 architecture.
Core Count and Threading: A Multitasking Showdown
The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS packs a punch with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7 11375H offers **4 cores and 8 threads**. This difference in core count and threading capabilities directly impacts multitasking performance.
With its higher core count, the Ryzen 7 8840HS excels at handling demanding applications that require simultaneous processing. This makes it ideal for professionals involved in video editing, 3D rendering, or other resource-intensive tasks. The Intel Core i7 11375H, despite its lower core count, can still handle everyday tasks and light gaming efficiently. However, it may struggle with more demanding applications that require a higher degree of parallelism.
Clock Speeds: Reaching for the Peak Performance
The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS boasts a base clock speed of 3.3 GHz and a boost clock speed of **4.8 GHz**. The Intel Core i7 11375H offers a base clock speed of **2.4 GHz** and a boost clock speed of **4.8 GHz**. While both processors share the same boost clock speed, the Ryzen 7 8840HS enjoys a significant advantage in base clock speed.
This difference in base clock speeds translates to faster overall performance, especially for tasks that don’t require the full boost clock speed. The Ryzen 7 8840HS can maintain higher performance levels for a longer duration, leading to a smoother and more responsive user experience.
Benchmark Results: Putting the Processors to the Test
To objectively assess the performance of these two CPUs, we can look at benchmark results from reputable sources like Geekbench, Cinebench, and 3DMark. These benchmarks provide a standardized way to compare CPU performance across different models.
Geekbench: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS consistently outperforms the Intel Core i7 11375H in Geekbench benchmarks, scoring significantly higher in both single-core and multi-core tests. This indicates that the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers superior performance for both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications.
Cinebench: Similarly, the Ryzen 7 8840HS takes the lead in Cinebench benchmarks, demonstrating its prowess in rendering and other CPU-intensive tasks. Its higher core count and more efficient architecture allow it to deliver faster rendering times and overall better performance.
3DMark: While both processors perform adequately in 3DMark benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 8840HS again edges out the Intel Core i7 11375H, showcasing its superior performance for gaming and other graphics-intensive applications.
Power Consumption and Thermal Management: Efficiency and Longevity
The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS boasts a 15W TDP (Thermal Design Power), while the Intel Core i7 11375H has a 35W TDP. This significant difference in TDP highlights the Ryzen 7 8840HS’s superior power efficiency.
The lower TDP of the Ryzen 7 8840HS allows laptops to run cooler and quieter, extending battery life and reducing fan noise. This is particularly beneficial for users who prioritize portability and a quiet computing experience. The Intel Core i7 11375H, with its higher TDP, may generate more heat and require more aggressive cooling solutions, potentially impacting battery life and overall user experience.
Price and Value: Finding the Sweet Spot
The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS is often found in laptops priced slightly higher than those equipped with the Intel Core i7 11375H. However, the performance gains and power efficiency offered by the Ryzen 7 8840HS justify the slight premium.
For users who prioritize performance, power efficiency, and a longer battery life, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS presents a compelling value proposition. However, if you are on a tighter budget and don’t require the absolute peak performance, the Intel Core i7 11375H can still deliver a solid experience for everyday tasks and light gaming.
The Verdict: A Clear Winner for Performance and Efficiency
In this showdown between the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS and the Intel Core i7 11375H, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS emerges as the clear winner based on its superior performance, power efficiency, and overall value. Its Zen 4 architecture, higher core count, and faster clock speeds enable it to deliver exceptional performance for demanding applications, while its lower TDP ensures a cooler, quieter, and longer-lasting computing experience.
While the Intel Core i7 11375H still offers decent performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, it falls short of the Ryzen 7 8840HS in terms of performance, efficiency, and overall value.
Frequently Discussed Topics
Q1: Which CPU is better for gaming?
A1: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS generally offers better gaming performance due to its higher core count, faster clock speeds, and improved efficiency. However, the actual gaming performance can vary depending on the specific game and other system components like the graphics card.
Q2: Which CPU is better for video editing?
A2: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS is the clear winner for video editing. Its higher core count and threading capabilities allow it to handle demanding video editing software and render complex projects much faster than the Intel Core i7 11375H.
Q3: Which CPU is better for multitasking?
A3: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS excels at multitasking due to its higher core count and threading capabilities. It can handle multiple demanding applications simultaneously without significant performance degradation.
Q4: Which CPU has better battery life?
A4: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS offers significantly better battery life due to its lower TDP and more efficient architecture. It consumes less power, allowing laptops to run for longer periods on a single charge.
Q5: Which CPU is better for everyday tasks?
A5: While both CPUs can handle everyday tasks adequately, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS offers a smoother and more responsive experience thanks to its faster processing speeds and overall better performance.
