Compare, analyze, and conquer. CPUcheckpro: Your CPU performance solution.

Unveiling the Truth: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Intel Core i5 10400 Performance Tested

Summary

  • The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a part of AMD’s latest Ryzen 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture, while the Core i5 10400 belongs to Intel’s 10th generation Comet Lake series.
  • The Core i5 10400, on the other hand, is known for its power efficiency, making it a suitable choice for budget-conscious users.
  • The Ryzen 7 7840HS is the performance champion, offering a significant leap forward in terms of speed, features, and efficiency.

Choosing the right CPU for your laptop can be a daunting task, especially when faced with a plethora of options. Two popular choices often come into play: the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i5 10400. Both processors offer impressive performance, but they cater to different needs and budgets. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key features, benchmarks, and real-world applications of each CPU to help you make an informed decision.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i5 10400 represent two distinct generations of processor technology. The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a part of AMD’s latest Ryzen 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture, while the Core i5 10400 belongs to Intel’s 10th generation Comet Lake series. This generational gap brings significant differences in performance, power consumption, and features.

Performance: A Head-to-Head Showdown

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS boasts a clear advantage in raw performance. Its Zen 4 architecture delivers a significant leap forward in terms of clock speeds, IPC (instructions per clock), and overall efficiency. In benchmark tests, the Ryzen 7 7840HS consistently outperforms the Core i5 10400 in multi-core tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and gaming.
For instance, in Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores around 20,000 points in multi-core performance, while the Core i5 10400 typically falls around 10,000 points. This difference is attributed to the Ryzen 7 7840HS’s higher core count (8 cores vs. 6 cores) and its superior clock speeds.

Power Efficiency: A Balancing Act

While the Ryzen 7 7840HS excels in performance, it does come at a higher power consumption cost. The Zen 4 architecture is known for its efficiency improvements, but it still demands more power than the older Comet Lake architecture. The Core i5 10400, on the other hand, is known for its power efficiency, making it a suitable choice for budget-conscious users.

Gaming Performance: A Competitive Edge

Both CPUs can handle modern games, but the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers a smoother and more consistent gaming experience, especially in demanding titles. Its higher clock speeds and multi-core performance translate into higher frame rates and improved responsiveness. However, the difference in gaming performance might not be as significant as in other tasks, especially at lower resolutions.

Features: A Modern Advantage

The Ryzen 7 7840HS benefits from the latest technological advancements in the CPU space. It features support for PCIe 5.0, which enables faster data transfer speeds for peripherals and storage devices. Additionally, it integrates a powerful integrated graphics processor, making it suitable for casual gaming and media consumption.

Price: A Balancing Act

The Ryzen 7 7840HS typically comes at a higher price point than the Core i5 10400. This price difference reflects the newer architecture, improved performance, and additional features of the Ryzen 7 7840HS. However, the Core i5 10400 remains a compelling choice for budget-minded users who prioritize affordability without compromising on basic performance.

Making the Right Choice: A Practical Guide

The choice between the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i5 10400 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize raw performance, multi-tasking capabilities, and the latest features, the Ryzen 7 7840HS is the ideal choice. It excels in demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and gaming.
However, if you are on a tight budget and prioritize power efficiency, the Core i5 10400 is a solid option. It offers respectable performance for everyday tasks, such as web browsing, productivity, and light gaming.

The Final Verdict: A Balanced Perspective

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i5 10400 are both capable CPUs that cater to different needs. The Ryzen 7 7840HS is the performance champion, offering a significant leap forward in terms of speed, features, and efficiency. However, the Core i5 10400 remains a budget-friendly option with respectable performance for everyday tasks.
Ultimately, the best CPU for you depends on your individual requirements and budget. Consider your typical workload, desired performance level, and financial constraints before making a decision.

Common Questions and Answers

Q1: Which CPU is better for gaming?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS generally offers better gaming performance due to its higher clock speeds and multi-core capabilities. However, the difference might not be significant for all games, especially at lower resolutions.
Q2: Which CPU is more power-efficient?
A: The Intel Core i5 10400 is more power-efficient than the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS. The Comet Lake architecture is known for its lower power consumption compared to the newer Zen 4 architecture.
Q3: Which CPU is better for video editing?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better choice for video editing due to its superior multi-core performance and faster clock speeds. It can handle demanding video editing tasks more efficiently.
Q4: Which CPU is more affordable?
A: The Intel Core i5 10400 is generally more affordable than the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS. This price difference reflects the older architecture and fewer features of the Core i5 10400.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Jamie is a passionate tech enthusiast and the author behind CPUCheckPro.com. With a deep understanding of computer hardware, he strives to provide comprehensive CPU comparison guides, insightful knowledge, and valuable tips to help users make informed decisions about their CPU choices.