Compare, analyze, and conquer. CPUcheckpro: Your CPU performance solution.

Unleashing the Power: AMD Ryzen 7 3700U vs Intel Core M 5Y31 – Who Reigns Supreme in CPU Performance?

Overview

  • On the other hand, the Intel Core M 5Y31, released in 2015, is a dual-core processor with a base frequency of 1.
  • The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U features the Radeon Vega 10 graphics, which offer significantly better performance than the Intel HD Graphics 5300 found in the Core M 5Y31.
  • However, the Intel Core M 5Y31 still holds its own as a budget-friendly option for basic tasks and those who prioritize a quiet and cool running device.

Choosing the right CPU for your laptop can be a daunting task, especially when faced with a sea of options. Today, we’ll be diving deep into the battle of the titans: AMD Ryzen 7 3700U vs Intel Core M 5Y31. Both processors are designed for thin and light laptops, but which one comes out on top? Let’s break down their performance, features, and ultimately, help you decide which is the better fit for your needs.

A Look at the Contenders: AMD Ryzen 7 3700U and Intel Core M 5Y31

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, released in 2019, is a powerful processor built on the Zen+ architecture. It boasts 4 cores and 8 threads, clocked at a base frequency of 2.3 GHz and a boost clock of up to 4.0 GHz. On the other hand, the Intel Core M 5Y31, released in 2015, is a dual-core processor with a base frequency of 1.1 GHz and a boost clock of 2.9 GHz. It’s based on the Broadwell architecture and lacks the multi-threading capabilities found in the Ryzen 7 3700U.

Performance: A Tale of Two Architectures

When it comes to raw performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is the clear winner. Its quad-core design and higher clock speeds deliver significantly faster results in various tasks, including:

  • Multi-tasking: The Ryzen 7 3700U handles multiple applications running simultaneously with ease, thanks to its 8 threads.
  • Gaming: While not a gaming beast, the Ryzen 7 3700U can handle casual games and even some demanding titles at lower settings.
  • Productivity: For demanding tasks like video editing and content creation, the Ryzen 7 3700U provides the necessary horsepower.

The Intel Core M 5Y31, despite its lower clock speeds, can still handle basic tasks like web browsing and light productivity work. However, it struggles with demanding applications and games, and its dual-core design limits its multitasking capabilities.

Power Consumption and Battery Life: A Balancing Act

Both CPUs are designed for energy efficiency, but the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U takes the lead. Its 15W TDP (Thermal Design Power) allows for longer battery life, especially when compared to the 4.5W TDP of the Intel Core M 5Y31. However, the lower TDP of the Core M 5Y31 translates to quieter operation and a cooler running device.

Integrated Graphics: A Clear Winner

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U features the Radeon Vega 10 graphics, which offer significantly better performance than the Intel HD Graphics 5300 found in the Core M 5Y31. This translates to smoother visuals in games and better performance in graphics-intensive applications.

Price: A Significant Factor

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is a newer processor, and its price reflects that. It’s generally more expensive than the Intel Core M 5Y31, which is now considered an older generation CPU. However, the price difference is often justified by the significant performance gains offered by the Ryzen 7 3700U.

Choosing the Right Processor: A Practical Guide

So, which CPU should you choose? It depends on your specific needs and budget.
Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U if:

  • You need a powerful processor for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and multi-tasking.
  • You prioritize longer battery life and excellent graphics performance.
  • You’re willing to pay a premium for the latest technology and performance.

Choose the Intel Core M 5Y31 if:

  • You’re looking for a budget-friendly option for basic tasks like web browsing and light productivity.
  • You prioritize a quiet and cool running device.
  • You don’t need the latest technology or the most powerful performance.

A Final Verdict: The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U Takes the Crown

In the end, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U emerges as the clear winner in this battle. Its superior performance, power efficiency, and integrated graphics make it a compelling choice for anyone seeking a powerful and versatile laptop. However, the Intel Core M 5Y31 still holds its own as a budget-friendly option for basic tasks and those who prioritize a quiet and cool running device. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your individual needs and preferences.

The Future of Mobile Computing: Beyond the Battle

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U and Intel Core M 5Y31 represent just a snapshot of the ever-evolving world of mobile computing. As technology continues to advance, we can expect even more powerful and efficient processors, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in thin and light laptops. Whether it’s AMD or Intel leading the charge, the future of mobile computing promises to be exciting and full of innovation.

What You Need to Know

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U good for gaming?
A: While not a dedicated gaming processor, the Ryzen 7 3700U can handle casual games and some demanding titles at lower settings. Its integrated graphics provide decent performance for a thin and light laptop.
Q: Which CPU is better for productivity tasks like video editing?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is significantly better for productivity tasks like video editing, thanks to its multi-core design and higher clock speeds.
Q: Does the Intel Core M 5Y31 still have any advantages?
A: While the Core M 5Y31 is outdated, it still offers a more affordable option for basic tasks and those who prioritize a quiet and cool running device.
Q: What are the key differences between the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U and the Intel Core M 5Y31?
A: The Ryzen 7 3700U is a newer, more powerful processor with a quad-core design, higher clock speeds, better integrated graphics, and longer battery life. The Core M 5Y31 is an older, less powerful processor with a dual-core design, lower clock speeds, weaker integrated graphics, and shorter battery life. However, it’s also more affordable.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Jamie is a passionate tech enthusiast and the author behind CPUCheckPro.com. With a deep understanding of computer hardware, he strives to provide comprehensive CPU comparison guides, insightful knowledge, and valuable tips to help users make informed decisions about their CPU choices.