Battle of the CPUs: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core i7 14700HX Unveiled

Key points

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is based on the latest Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Core i7 14700HX utilizes the Raptor Lake architecture.
In graphics-intensive benchmarks, the integrated Radeon 780M graphics in the Ryzen 7 8845HS offers a significant performance advantage over the Intel Iris Xe graphics in the Core i7 14700HX.
If you primarily use your laptop for gaming or content creation, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS might be a better choice due to its integrated graphics and power efficiency.

Choosing the right CPU for your laptop can be a daunting task, especially with the constant barrage of new releases and competing technologies. Two of the most popular choices in the high-performance segment are the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and the Intel Core i7 14700HX. Both processors offer impressive performance and efficiency, but which one comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will explore their key features, benchmarks, and real-world performance to help you make an informed decision.

In This Article

The Battle of the Architectures: Zen 4 vs Raptor Lake
Performance Comparison: Benchmarks and Real-World Tests
Power Consumption and Battery Life
Choosing the Right CPU: Factors to Consider
Verdict: A Close Race with Different Strengths

The Battle of the Architectures: Zen 4 vs Raptor Lake

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is based on the latest Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Core i7 14700HX utilizes the Raptor Lake architecture. Both architectures bring significant improvements over their predecessors, but they have distinct strengths and weaknesses.
AMD Zen 4:

Focus on Efficiency: Zen 4 prioritizes power efficiency while maintaining high performance. This is achieved through a more refined design and optimizations in the manufacturing process.
Improved IPC: Zen 4 offers a substantial increase in instructions per clock (IPC), translating to faster performance in single-threaded workloads.
Integrated RDNA 3 Graphics: The Ryzen 7 8845HS features integrated Radeon 780M graphics, offering a significant leap in performance compared to previous generations.

Intel Raptor Lake:

More Cores and Threads: Raptor Lake boasts a higher core count and thread count compared to its predecessor, Alder Lake. This translates to superior performance in multi-threaded applications.
Improved Cache Hierarchy: Raptor Lake features a larger L3 cache, which can improve performance in certain scenarios by reducing the need for data access from slower memory.
Enhanced Turbo Boost Technology: Intel’s Turbo Boost technology has been further improved, allowing for higher clock speeds when needed.

Performance Comparison: Benchmarks and Real-World Tests

To understand the true performance difference, we need to look at benchmarks and real-world testing. While benchmarks provide a controlled environment, real-world tests offer a better understanding of how these CPUs perform in everyday tasks.
Benchmark Results:

Cinebench R23: The Intel Core i7 14700HX scores higher in multi-core performance thanks to its higher core count. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms in single-core performance due to its higher IPC.
Geekbench 5: Similar to Cinebench, the Intel Core i7 14700HX leads in multi-core scores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS performs better in single-core tests.
3DMark Time Spy: In graphics-intensive benchmarks, the integrated Radeon 780M graphics in the Ryzen 7 8845HS offers a significant performance advantage over the Intel Iris Xe graphics in the Core i7 14700HX.

Real-World Performance:

Gaming: Both CPUs can handle demanding games at high settings, but the Ryzen 7 8845HS offers smoother gameplay thanks to its faster integrated graphics.
Video Editing: The Intel Core i7 14700HX excels in video editing due to its higher core count, allowing for faster rendering times.
Productivity: Both CPUs provide excellent performance in productivity tasks like web browsing, document editing, and multitasking.

Power Consumption and Battery Life

Power consumption is a crucial factor for laptops, especially for those who value portability and battery life. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS has a clear advantage in this area.

Lower TDP: The Ryzen 7 8845HS has a lower thermal design power (TDP) compared to the Core i7 14700HX, meaning it consumes less power and generates less heat.
Longer Battery Life: The lower power consumption translates to longer battery life in real-world usage scenarios.

Choosing the Right CPU: Factors to Consider

The best CPU for you depends on your specific needs and priorities. Here are some factors to consider:

Workload: If you primarily use your laptop for gaming or content creation, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS might be a better choice due to its integrated graphics and power efficiency.
Multitasking: For heavy multitasking or intense workloads like video editing, the Intel Core i7 14700HX’s higher core count might be beneficial.
Battery Life: If you need long battery life and portability, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is the clear winner.
Budget: The pricing of both CPUs can vary depending on the laptop model, so it’s important to factor in your budget when making a decision.

Verdict: A Close Race with Different Strengths

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Intel Core i7 14700HX are both powerful CPUs that offer excellent performance. The Ryzen 7 8845HS excels in power efficiency, integrated graphics, and single-core performance, making it a great option for gamers and users who prioritize battery life. The Intel Core i7 14700HX shines in multi-threaded workloads and offers a higher core count, making it ideal for video editors and heavy multitaskers.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual needs and priorities. Consider your workload, budget, and desired battery life before making a decision.

The Future of High-Performance CPUs

The competition between AMD and Intel is fierce, and both companies are constantly pushing the boundaries of processor performance. We can expect to see even more powerful and efficient CPUs in the future, further blurring the lines between these two giants.